Marc Armitage - Thought Crime

School

Hard lessons on the road to becoming an advocate for children and their playing

Submitted by:9-Aug-2021
Hard lessons on the road to becoming an advocate for children and their playing

1,100 words about the importance of advocating for children and their playing by way of a hard lesson learnt.

"The children at this school told me about ‘The Swinging Tree’. It was right at the back of the school field and was called this because there was one branch in particular that was at just the right angle and height to produce a great place to swing."

... read more

Chinese Skipping

Submitted by:7-Jul-2020
Chinese Skipping

670 words on the history of one particular form of skipping game, a radio show, and the contibution of a littleold lady.

"Interview done, I sat back sipping my cup of BBC coffee and listened to the calls coming in. One of them took me and the programme staff aback a little."

... read more

Chopper Envy

Submitted by:16-Jun-2020
Chopper Envy

An 800 word short on the importance of bikes for children's independent mobility and a bit of chopper envy.

"I kept saying to him, ‘Don’t let go, don’t let go!’ and he replied repeatedly, I won’t!’ with me never realising at the key moment that his replies were getting fainter and fainter."

 

... read more

Keeping secrets from children is virtually impossible

Submitted by:15-Mar-2020
Keeping secrets from children is virtually impossible

A short on pots and pans, secruity measures, and how keeping secrets from children is virtually impossible.

"Then, one day I turned up at the school and, as per usual, headed for the staff room but when I got there I couldn’t get in. Between visits a new push button security lock had been added to the staff room door and, of course, I didn’t know the code."

... read more

To be or not to be play-based

Submitted by:1-Mar-2020
To be or not to be play-based

A short on an online conversation, confusion over what is and is not 'play-based learning' and the pressures facing educators. 

"When educators, in the early years especially, say that they are not getting the results they expect from a play-based approach the most common reason is that they are not actually applying a play-based approach."

... read more

Is play a right or a privilege?

Submitted by:26-Jan-2020
Is play a right or a privilege?

A biographical short on how schools treat the recess/playtime periods at school for objectives other than playing. 

"Well if you can’t learn to behave yourself properly then I’m banning you from this week’s lesson on the Tudor kings and queens.”

... read more

One-Way Only

Submitted by:13-Jan-2020
One-Way Only

A biographical short on rules, who they apply to and who they do not.

"I had to deliver the initial results of my interviews to a whole staff after school hours meeting and at the opening of the presentation I laid out a number of rules for the next hour that I was applying ‘for safety reasons’."

... read more

This is deeply concerning

Submitted by:6-Jan-2020

A biographical short on the state of children's psychic health and witches.

"After delivering my paper there was only sporadic applause for my efforts and despite the convener asking if anyone had questions there were none. Once I got back to my hotel though the emails  started to arrive."

... read more

Listen first - act second

Submitted by:31-Dec-2019
Listen first - act second

A biographical short on why sometimes the best intentions can hinder rather than help. 

"His support staff had noticed this was making it difficult for him to get around independently in his old unpowered chair. So, to help him his school decided to put some of his support money towards buying him an electric wheelchair."

... read more

Life kicks the silliness out of us

Submitted by:24-Dec-2019
Life kicks the silliness out of us

A biographical short on the importance of silliness.

"We should probably gloss over the night we nearly set the boat on fire because we had gone to the pub forgetting that we had left the oven on, or the trouble we got into by accidentally entering the tidal waters of Great Yarmouth."

... read more

Are you planning to hit me with that thing?

Submitted by:12-Dec-2019
Are you planning to hit me with that thing?

A biographical short on the difference between one of my schools and another. 

"School was ok too - I settled in quite quickly, made some good friends and generally I have good memories of my time there. There was one aspect of this new school that I really struggled with, though."

... read more

Loose parts and open-endedness (1 of 2)

Submitted by:15-May-2019
Loose parts and open-endedness (1 of 2)

900 words about the confusion some find over using loose parts and how that relates to 'open-endedness'. The first of a two-part blog.

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

"By definition an object, whether a loose part or not, cannot be ‘open-ended’."

... read more

That first day of school

Submitted by:22-Mar-2019
That first day of school

850 words about my first day at school.

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

"I have a vision of standing beside the kind of sand and water tray that would not out be out of place in any early year’s centre today and pretty much staying there not daring to move."

 

... read more

Great moments in a darked room

Submitted by:1-Mar-2019
Great moments in a darked room

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

850  words about a memorable, exciting moment in a darkend room with a loose parts element. 

"This may sound silly, but my hands were shaking a little as I opened the envelope and a waft of a familiar smell leapt out ..."

 

 

... read more

Caging the Wild Animal

Submitted by:10-Sep-2018
Caging the Wild Animal

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

900 words about the deep suspicion there appears to be for 'play' in the American kindergarten classroom.

"Restricting particular types of play, or learning, into a predesignated ‘corner’, ‘area’ or ‘station’ is like putting a wild animal in a cage and thinking that’s helpful. It’s not."

 

... read more

The ugly side of loose parts

Submitted by:2-Sep-2018
The ugly side of loose parts

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

900 words about Simon Nicholson's 'Theory of Loose Parts' that asks if we are missing something in our interpretation of his ideas.

"Pretty collections of beads and shells, plastic shapes and buttons, stored neatly in nice wicker baskets or storage tubs, etc. do indeed constitute loose parts, there is a slight problem here. Becoming fixated with seeing ‘loose parts’ as just these small aesthetically pleasing things at the expense of others that might be less attractive to the adult eye really misses the major idea behind Nicholson’s original theory.​"

... read more

When is a good research paper not a good research paper

Submitted by:24-Aug-2018
When is a good research paper not a good research paper

a \‘shȯrt-rēd’\ piece

900 words asking when is a good research paper not a good research paper, highlighting issues with one recently published piece on the play of school playgrounds.

"A good research paper, even when it produces a counterintuitive conclusion, can slice through the bias of an emotional response better than a hot knife through an organically produced, seed-oil based butter substitute."

... read more

Playing, obesity, well-meaning adults, a bit of history and a dose of reality

Submitted by:28-Apr-2014

"The approach that often well-meaning campaigns, such as the latest Irish ‘Let’s take on childhood obesity’ campaign, adopt in relation to children playing, often leaves me cold."

This piece describes how assumptions about children's lives can sometimes override reality and that even well-meaning people can advance projects that they might feel will be of benefit but which ultimately are just trying to fix something that simply is not broken.

... read more

Fuzzy and Headless Children

Submitted by:30-Nov-2012
Fuzzy and Headless Children

"It now seems routine that not only is TV news footage of children altered to disguise identity but so are images of children gathered for other reasons too."

Fuzzy and headless children are everywhere and we think it is contributing to making children's lives safer but it is not. The real effect is a negative one and it affects more than just children.

... read more

Disclosure: ‘a revelation of abuse or harm’

Submitted by:25-Jun-2012

"I have a message to all those out there that might not have much respect for the well-being agenda or who might believe that the issue of children’s happiness is nothing but a modern fad that has no real bearing on the real world. You’re an idiot."

Some aspects of Playwork are harder than others. This story highlights one of the most profound.

... read more

Should children Have Access to Facebook?

Submitted by:28-Apr-2012

"Why is it that a legislator feels the necessity to legally protect the rights of adults in relation to privacy and social networking but not of children and young people?"

This is not a question of new fangled technology and the need for the latest electronic gizmo. It's about independence and recognising that the children and young people of today live different lives to that which we did and have opportunities available to them which we may not fully understand.

... read more

When is a good research paper not a good research paper

It is a habit of mine to ask for a reference or citation when matters of fact are quoted with no source simply because a research based approach to working with children and young people should be the norm in developing good practice – emotive anecdotal comments should be the exception. This is especially true in the field of play and playing as it can sometimes become an emotive topic and a good research paper, even when it produces a counterintuitive conclusion, can slice through the bias of an emotional response better than a hot knife through an organically produced, seed-oil based butter substitute.

Unfortunately, this recent paper ‘Individual and environmental correlates of school-based recess engagement’ published in the journal, Preventative Medicine Reports just isn’t (vol 11 Sept. 2018 p247-253).

The paper begins well enough by acknowledging that recess periods in the school day have been in decline in school districts throughout the USA and concludes that this is not a good thing. It goes on to say that this is not a good thing because, “The school day … is a prime opportunity to promote PA [physical activity].”

And that’s where we hit the first problem.

This paper is a classic of the physiological type of research that is concerned exclusively with the health benefits of children being physical activity to the exclusion of all else. The introduction sets its overall aim out very clearly when it says, “Physical activity is important to help curb high obesity rates amongst today’s children.”

Methodologically it’s a very tight paper and no doubt well intentioned. The research involved more than 8,000 children in seven schools in which one part of the study held observations of ‘recess activity engagement’ while in another data from the wearing of a Fitbit activity monitor were taken and the two sets of data then combined and analysed. The tabulated results are clearly laid out and easy to read.

It is the conclusions that the paper reaches that are worrisome, though: It concludes that girls tend to be less physically active during recess periods than boys – and that’s no surprise as most similar research has drawn the same conclusion. Yet it is how this is stated that starts the alarm bells ringing as its says that more than a quarter of children (particularly girls) were observed in “sedentary activities (e.g. talking with friends).” The bias here is beginning to peek out.

The paper also quotes previous research on the topic stating that it found, “… adding more playground equipment and providing a structured recess yielded the largest effect on [physical activity].” This paper seems to agree with that. In fact, the reference to ‘sedentary activities’ above shows very clearly that the researchers are seeing the potential benefits of playing purely in the context of increased physical activity – sitting play bad, running around play good – and the major conclusion it reaches is that the involvement of adult-initiated and structured activity is essential to getting the desired increase in physical activity:  

“… in the current study, adult engagement and supervision was identified as the most salient recess level predictor of engagement for boys and girls. Thus, in considering how to take advantage of limited [recess] time for PA … adults can be more than passive observers assigned to monitor recess, but can also be active participants, and even beneficial role models, for children on and around the playground.”

It’s almost as if the research has been funded by an organisation with a vested interest in adult-led playground intervention projects, isn’t it?

Yet at one point, the paper makes an almost throw away comment that might lead to an alternative conclusion. It notes that recess in the study schools accounted for approximately 5.6% of the school day and then, shock horror, finds that, “Interestingly, recess length was a significant predictor of both MVPA [moderate-to-vigorous physical activity], and steps per minute taken during recess. This finding suggests that extra recess time not only increases opportunities for physical activity, but that children are more active with the time they have when this is increased.”

So, to increase physical activity simply increase the length of recess time, right?

One of the real problems behind this paper is that it has a clear bias in its approach paradigm that seriously narrows any possible conclusion. At one point the authors claim, “To date, no study has concurrently examined the contextual features of the environment and what students chose to do during recess in a systematic way.”

Oh, really? I could lead them to a decent sized metaphorical warehouse full of research relating to school recess periods that has done just that; but they have done so from alternative paradigm to that of the authors who appear to have no previous knowledge of other approaches – all except one of the extensive references cited are from a physiological perspective.

Much of this non-physiological research quotes the benefits of recess that goes beyond the purely physical (see just about anything by Peter Blatchford and Anthony Pellegrini, for example) and not the least amongst those benefits is the value of unstructured time away from adult imposed activity rather than arguing for more.

So, when is a good play research paper not a good play research paper? When it may, even with the best intentions in mind, make the reality of play for children harder to achieve rather than easier. That’s when.

Marc Armitage

Article

It is a habit of mine to ask for a reference or citation when matters of fact are quoted with no source simply because a research based approach to working with children and young people should be the norm in developing good practice – emotive anecdotal comments should be the exception. This is especially true in the field of play and playing as it can sometimes become an emotive topic and a good research paper, even when it produces a counterintuitive conclusion, can slice through the bias of an emotional response better than a hot knife through an organically produced, seed-oil based butter substitute.

Unfortunately, this recent paper ‘Individual and environmental correlates of school-based recess engagement’ published in the journal, Preventative Medicine Reports just isn’t (vol 11 Sept. 2018 p247-253).

The paper begins well enough by acknowledging that recess periods in the school day have been in decline in school districts throughout the USA and concludes that this is not a good thing. It goes on to say that this is not a good thing because, “The school day … is a prime opportunity to promote PA [physical activity].”

And that’s where we hit the first problem.

This paper is a classic of the physiological type of research that is concerned exclusively with the health benefits of children being physical activity to the exclusion of all else. The introduction sets its overall aim out very clearly when it says, “Physical activity is important to help curb high obesity rates amongst today’s children.”

Methodologically it’s a very tight paper and no doubt well intentioned. The research involved more than 8,000 children in seven schools in which one part of the study held observations of ‘recess activity engagement’ while in another data from the wearing of a Fitbit activity monitor were taken and the two sets of data then combined and analysed. The tabulated results are clearly laid out and easy to read.

It is the conclusions that the paper reaches that are worrisome, though: It concludes that girls tend to be less physically active during recess periods than boys – and that’s no surprise as most similar research has drawn the same conclusion. Yet it is how this is stated that starts the alarm bells ringing as its says that more than a quarter of children (particularly girls) were observed in “sedentary activities (e.g. talking with friends).” The bias here is beginning to peek out.

The paper also quotes previous research on the topic stating that it found, “… adding more playground equipment and providing a structured recess yielded the largest effect on [physical activity].” This paper seems to agree with that. In fact, the reference to ‘sedentary activities’ above shows very clearly that the researchers are seeing the potential benefits of playing purely in the context of increased physical activity – sitting play bad, running around play good – and the major conclusion it reaches is that the involvement of adult-initiated and structured activity is essential to getting the desired increase in physical activity:  

 

“… in the current study, adult engagement and supervision was identified as the most salient recess level predictor of engagement for boys and girls. Thus, in considering how to take advantage of limited [recess] time for PA … adults can be more than passive observers assigned to monitor recess, but can also be active participants, and even beneficial role models, for children on and around the playground.”

It’s almost as if the research has been funded by an organisation with a vested interest in adult-led playground intervention projects, isn’t it?

Yet at one point, the paper makes an almost throw away comment that might lead to an alternative conclusion. It notes that recess in the study schools accounted for approximately 5.6% of the school day and then, shock horror, finds that, “Interestingly, recess length was a significant predictor of both MVPA [moderate-to-vigorous physical activity], and steps per minute taken during recess. This finding suggests that extra recess time not only increases opportunities for physical activity, but that children are more active with the time they have when this is increased.”

So, to increase physical activity simply increase the length of recess time, right?

One of the real problems behind this paper is that it has a clear bias in its approach paradigm that seriously narrows any possible conclusion. At one point the authors claim, “To date, no study has concurrently examined the contextual features of the environment and what students chose to do during recess in a systematic way.”

Oh, really? I could lead them to a decent sized metaphorical warehouse full of research relating to school recess periods that has done just that; but they have done so from alternative paradigm to that of the authors who appear to have no previous knowledge of other approaches – all except one of the extensive references cited are from a physiological perspective.

Much of this non-physiological research quotes the benefits of recess that goes beyond the purely physical (see just about anything by Peter Blatchford and Anthony Pellegrini, for example) and not the least amongst those benefits is the value of unstructured time away from adult imposed activity rather than arguing for more.

So, when is a good play research paper not a good play research paper? When it may, even with the best intentions in mind, make the reality of play for children harder to achieve rather than easier. That’s when.

Marc Armitage